Along West
Assembly constituency 30 (ST) · Arunachal Pradesh
[01]Result · 2004
#30 · STAll candidates 4
Turnout 81.4%
Electors by sex are not recorded for this contest.
- Sex ratiofemales per 1,000 malesNot recorded
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- State median turnoutmedian of 57 seats, 200472.6%
- ReconciliationΣ 4 candidates = 8,122Verified
Seat history 2019–1978
- 2019
8.3 ppTumke BagraBharatiya Janata Party
- 2014
25.4 ppTumke BagraBharatiya Janata Party
- 2009
0.3 ppGadam EteIndian National Congress
- 2004
3.6 ppGadam EteIndian National Congress
- 1999
30.4 ppKento EteIndian National Congress
- 1995
14.8 ppKento EteIndian National Congress
- 1990
7.8 ppKirge EshiJanata Dal
- 1984
8.9 ppHejam PonglahamIndian National Congress
- 1980
39.9 ppHaijen PonglahamIndian National Congress
- 1978
18.2 ppWnagnam WangshuJanata Party
Winning margin in percentage points; bars scaled to the widest, 39.9 pp.
[02]Computed insights
Arithmetic · working shown-
Third-placed BJP polled 529 votes, 1.8× the 290-vote margin.
529 ÷ 290 = 1.8 -
The top two polled 93.1% of votes; the other 2 candidates 6.9% between them.
(3,926 + 3,636) ÷ 8,122 = 93.1% · 560 ÷ 8,122 = 6.9% -
Turnout of 81.4% was 8.8 pp above the state's median seat (72.6%).
81.4 − 72.6 = +8.8 -
The margin narrowed from 30.4 pp in 1999 to 3.6 pp.
3.6 − 30.4 = −26.8 pp -
INC held the seat it won in 1999.
1999 INC · 2004 INC
Each line is arithmetic over the figures on this page.
[03]Reconciliation
Verified- Candidate votesΣ 4 candidate lines8,122
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- Published totalVotes polled8,122
- Checkcandidates = total, NOTA outside itHolds
Candidate votes equal the published total. NOTA is reported alongside it.
Contest resultElection Commission of India, constituency-wise results · Vidhan Sabha 2004 · Arunachal Pradesh · retrieval date not recorded in the results database
Candidates4 candidate lines from the same results · reconciliation: Verified
State median turnoutComputed from 57 seats on the Arunachal Pradesh Vidhan Sabha 2004 board · retrieval date not recorded in the results database